Skip Nav

Annex 2: Strengths and Weaknesses of Qualitative Evaluation Designs

Search form

❶How did you feel talking about the topics you asked yourself to discuss? Good article, provides a good general overview.

Qualitative Studies

Quantitative Studies
Secondary Navigation
You are here

Learn more about using quantitative and qualitative approaches in various study types in the next lesson. The link to the page is attached automtisk in the message to your friend. Menu Getting started Getting started Lesson 1: Explorative search Criteria for a problem formulation Find who and what you are looking for Too broad, too narrow, or o. Test your knowledge Lesson 2: Problem formulation Test your knowledge Lesson 3: Research objectives Test your knowledge Lesson 4: Synopsis Test your knowledge Lesson 5: Meeting your supervisor Getting started: Where to search Searching for articles Searching for Data Databases provided by your library Other useful search tools Test your knowledge Lesson 2: How to search Free text, truncating and exact phrase Combining search terms — Boolean operators Keep track of your search strategies Problems finding your search terms?

Creating an interview guide, identifying a sample, and conducting interviews are just the beginning. It is also not uncommon to offer respondents some monetary incentive or thank-you for participating. Conducting qualitative interviews is not only labor intensive but also emotionally taxing. When I interviewed young workers about their sexual harassment experiences, I heard stories that were shocking, infuriating, and sad.

Seeing and hearing the impact that harassment had had on respondents was difficult. Researchers embarking on a qualitative interview project should keep in mind their own abilities to hear stories that may be difficult to hear. Choose a delete action Empty this page Remove this page and its subpages.

Content is out of sync. You must reload the page to continue. Skip to main content. Interview guides can vary in format but should contain some outline of the topics you hope to cover during the course of an interview. NVivo and Atlasti are computer programs that qualitative researchers use to help them with organizing, sorting, and analyzing their data. Qualitative interviews allow respondents to share information in their own words and are useful for gathering detailed information and understanding social processes.

EXERCISES Based on a research question you have identified through earlier exercises in this text, write a few open-ended questions you could ask were you to conduct in-depth interviews on the topic. Now critique your questions. Are any of them leading? Read the open-ended questions you just created, and answer them as though you were an interview participant. Were your questions easy to answer or fairly difficult?

How did you feel talking about the topics you asked yourself to discuss? How might respondents feel talking about them? Relevance, Balance, and Accessibility. In a subsequent quantitative study, you could address these factors through a series of questions such as: An automated system assigns a numeric value to whatever option a participant chooses, allowing a researcher to quickly gather and analyze large amounts of data.

When setting out to perform user research—whether performing the research yourself or assigning it to an employee or a consultant—it is important to understand the different applications of these two approaches to research.

This understanding can help you to choose the appropriate research approach yourself, understand why a researcher has chosen a particular approach, or communicate with researchers or stakeholders about a research approach and your overarching research strategy.

In what other ways do you use and combine qualitative and quantitative research? The quantitative approach is so vital, even in our daily lives, because in most, if not all things we do in life, we measure to see how much there is of something.

Quantitative method is part of our daily life, even from birth, data are constantly being collected, assessed, and re-assessed as we grow. I also support the quantitative data because it is much used and almost whatever we do involves it.

Both quantitative and qualitative research are important on their own. It depends on the situation where a researcher conducts a particular research, or he can go for the mixed method, too.

For now, I am in need of sampling and non-sampling errors. Please help me understand its applications and the ways that can be checked? Types of sampling and all related information on this chapter. Quantitative data provides the facts, but facts about people are just another construct of our society.

Business understands that neither method should be relied upon exclusively, which is why they use both. Anyone who thinks this is a competition between the two methods to somehow win out needs to read the article again.

I also think that the quantitative approach is more important than the qualitative approach because we use it more and more in our life time. I would suggest using both quantitative and qualitative. Both are strong ways of getting information and hearing the views and suggestions of others.

It would be wiser to go for a mixed research method. This quantitative approach is the approach used to show the transparency that at the end shows the democracy in the Great lakes countries. Both methods are useful in real life situations. Quantitative research requires high levels of statistical understanding to enable the measurements of descriptive and inferential statistics to be computed and interpreted, whereas qualitative methods are critical to identifying gaps in underserved areas in the society.

More significantly, the use of a combination of the two is perfect. I am more confused when a particular method is considered superior over the other. I am more at ease looking at all three methods as situational—in that, some decision making requires the use of a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed method to accomplish my goals.

I think both qualitative and quantitative are good to go by, because the demerits of one are settled by the merits of the other. The lapses that one has are covered by the other, so I think, for better findings and more accurate results, a mixed method answers it all. Good article, provides a good general overview.

As a marketing-research consultant I want to stress that qualitative research helps you much more to collect insights for user stories—if you do SCRUM—get the reasons why that make you differ and not differ from competitors and that would allow you to positively stand out in the market.

I love the stats, measurements. Yet my clients get great stuff out of qual that quant could never deliver because it is tool for specific purposes—as qual is. If you have both in your toolbox and know how to handle them, you get a better product. Use them and use them wisely, know the strengths and weaknesses of both—or get someone who does—because your competitor might just do it right now.

Both methods play an equal role, especially in research, and may also influence each other. This will depend on time and the necessity for each method. A significance level set to 0. That is, one might observe statistical significance, regardless of sample size, but this may be a false positive—that is, the effect occurs by chance or due to the co-occurrence of other factors. In general, one should be cautious about making inferences based on results drawn from a small sample.

It must be remembered that the two methods are not competing.

Primary Mobile Navigation

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Qualitative research provides valuable data for use in the design of a product—including data about user needs, behavior patterns, and use cases. Each of these approaches has strengths and weaknesses, and each can benefit .

Privacy FAQs

Strengths and Weakness of The Qualitative Research Method Essay Words 12 Pages This essay intends to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of the quantitative and qualitative approaches to research which addresses young people and bullying using two journal articles.

About Our Ads

Comparatively evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. II. Literature Reviews The Strengths of Quantitative Research Methodology The quantitative as survey approach has two significant advantages. First, it can be administered and evaluated quickly. Disadvantages of Qualitative Research Qualitative research displays its own strengths however, this is also associated with some disadvantages and these include the following: • The quality of research is heavily dependent on the skills of the researcher and can be easily influenced by personal idiosyncrasies and biases of researchers.

Cookie Info

With qualitative research, the design typically emerges as the research study develops. Data Driven. Quantitative research depends on data and involves testing a hypothesis, but it can miss contextual details. For example, a researcher doesn't provide a detailed description when using quantitative research. Strengths and limitations. In qualitative research there is less emphasis on counting numbers of people who think or behave in certain ways and more emphasis on explaining why people think and behave in certain ways. Participants in qualitative studies often involve smaller numbers of tools include and utilizes open-ended questionnaires.