From what I have learned, it is, indeed, an extremely tough matter to deal with. While no-one I have spoken to has been suicidal over the matter, they have seen the true pain and misery that some severely disabled individuals are forced to deal with every day of their lives.
Still, many agree with myself on the point that a human life is just that, a human life; and that everyone alive has the right to live, no matter whether or not it is under tougher circumstances than another person. Nobody has the right to take the life of another person, and technically, the law states that nobody has the right to take their own life as well. A severely disabled person may have to deal with much pain in their lives, but they are entitled to the right of simply enjoying being alive, and denying them that right would be an infringement upon their freedom.
Latimer should have taken the law into deeper consideration before taking his daughters life. He may have seen the suffering that she went through, but it is evident that he had some sort of strange love for his daughter. He valued her rights as his daughter, unfortunately he did not value her rights as a human being. Thus, it would seem either extremely difficult for a jury to make a reasonable call on whether or not Latimer should have been guilty.
This raises an interesting point: A killer with a good defense would attempt to prove that they killed a disabled person to put them out of their misery, when indeed they may have had completely different, perhaps personal reasons to murder the individual.
Our system of laws is right in finding that to legalize euthanasia would far a massive risk upon the elderly, sick, and disabled of our society. This is a risk for which a law should not have to take blame for, and changing this law would only encourage that. Argumentative Essay Against Euthanasia Introduction. Euthanasia is the practice of deliberately killing a person to spare him or her from having to deal with more pain and suffering. This is always a controversial issue because of the moral and ethical components that are involved.
This paper will discuss the arguments against euthanasia. Euthanasia is clearly against the Hippocratic Oath that all doctors have to fulfil. This oath basically states that doctors must never be involved in the killing of people because after all, they have been trained to ensure that people are able to recover from their diseases and injuries. Doctors are the ones whom people entrust their lives whenever there is something wrong with their health.
Thus, it is the responsibility of the doctors to always do the best they can to help people live and enjoy their lives Cavan If their patients die under their supervision, the doctors can accept this for as long as they know and can prove that they really did their best and exhausted all possibilities to ensure the survival of the patients. There are just certain instances where the disease or the injury of the patients has become so serious that it is already difficult to treat and make the patients recover.
In these cases, it is unfair to blame the doctors for the death of the patients. The Hippocratic Oath helps the doctors to realize how important their responsibilities are to the people in terms of their health.
This oath also provides an assurance to the people that they can trust their doctors and be assured that they will do whatever is necessary to help them deal with their health problems. If euthanasia becomes legalized, then the effectiveness of the Hippocratic Oath will be negated and the doctors can have the option of immediately resorting to euthanasia especially in difficult cases instead of trying their best until the very end.
Another argument against euthanasia is that it is essentially homicide because the doctors will kill the patient even if it has been approved by the patient himself or the family of the patient. Euthanasia is not that different from murder because they both involve killing a person. The only difference is that in euthanasia, there is mercy and consent involved while in murder there is none Tulloch
Arguments Against Euthanasia Analysis Philosophy Essay. Print Reference this. Published: 23rd March, senile people who are difficult to be taken care off will be put for euthanasia to help their families save money from paying their hospital bills. So Kant is against Euthanasia as he is a deontological thinker and takes actions as.
The American Medical Association opposes euthanasia. Help is an essay against service that essay make your student life against, hassle-free and euthanasia. Buchanan Bibliography Friedman, Emily. The writer will format the paper according to your selected help e. Subscribe to this RSS feed.
The Case for Euthanasia - In order to provide a framework for my thesis statement on the morality of euthanasia, it is first necessary to define what euthanasia is and the different types of euthanasia. Against Euthanasia essaysLiterally, euthanasia means "good death" but the controversy surrounding it is just the opposite. In active euthanasia the immediate cause of death is not the patients disease but something that is done to the patient to cause his or her death. Because, active eu.
Argumentative Essay Against Euthanasia Introduction Euthanasia is the practice of deliberately killing a person to spare him or her from . Arguments For And Against Euthanasia Essay Words 8 Pages Euthanasia is the practice of ending an individual's life in order to relieve them from an incurable disease or unbearable suffering.